Category Archives: media

Harlem responds to the ‘Harlem’ Shake

Dang!

I had been thinking about posting about the Harlem shake meme videos — I was going to talk about the Waka Flocka Flame effect of enjoying music that makes you dance and have fun — considering the bodily invitation of Baauer’s nice tune.  I was thinking about mapping how many ways we are constrained in movement and how nice that these videos offered a chance to have fun and simply go dumb (Rest In Power Mac Dre).

But of course, the reason why people feel so seemingly liberated is that there is a script to follow — the dances are mapped quite carefully.  Check a couple of the internet meme videos and you’ll see the similarity in the costumes, poses, the points in the song where people are ‘allowed to dance,’ the invitation to unique foolishness is certainly there — but it is a copy of a copy of a copy. . . .

And in that copying is the insult for people who live in Harlem. The mockery and lack of respect for an actual dance form is central for many of the folks interviewed.  I bet most of the people who are in Harlem shake videos would respond by saying: ‘I didn’t know about the history and the ties to the location.”

Which is precisely the difficulty with internet meme videos — the absolute disconnection from context at precisely the time that we are inundated with thousands of replications of the image, each one loving re-embraced by the local players who perhaps (put new text around a much loved image) or (prepare to do the Harlem shake with their buddies arguing over ‘who get’s to wear the mask?’).  In most cases, the internet teaches us that what was once singularly owned or identified can be swept into the internet-o-sphere and assimilated, free of context or culture to become a clever short-term joke.

Thanks to Okayplayer who had the best coverage on this subject including a how-to on a slightly more authentic Harlem Shake.

Leave a comment

Filed under art, communication, cultural appropriation, funk & soul, hip hop, learning, media, music, representation

Reading Yu the turtle (re)productively

1.   The act of saving an individual turtle maimed by a shark is deeply symbolic.  The choice to save this turtle, Yu, must be contrasted against the ‘Japanese fishing net” which has probably maimed a thousand times as many turtles as the offending “brutal” shark.

KOBE, Japan — Life looked grim for Yu, a loggerhead turtle, when she washed up in a Japanese fishing net five years ago, her front flippers shredded after a brutal encounter with a shark.

via Keepers give loggerhead turtle prosthetic fins to swim again.

2.   Yu the mauled turtle is kept as an amusement (and testament to the generosity of humans) in a Kobe Aquarium.  She has been fitted with “27 models of prosthetic fins.”

Now keepers at an aquarium in the western Japanese city of Kobe are looking for a high-tech solution that will allow the 25-year-old turtle to swim normally again after years of labor and 27 models of prosthetic fins behind them without achieving their goal.

via Keepers give loggerhead turtle prosthetic fins to swim again.

3.  Her keepers enlisted the help of many experts who tried again and again to create prosthetic fins for this one turtle.  They often caused Yu pain while they tried to get her capable of swimming.  I suspect the experts received professional prestige for their work.  The executive director of the Aquarium (Kamezaki) seems to know that the alternative for Yu the turtle would be a quick death.  The playing-God impulse isn’t in the arrogance to choose what happens to Yu (they certainly could set her on the beach and see which ways she chooses to go).  The arrogance is in the commitment to hold this living animal as an experimental subject and believing that it is in her best interests.

After nursing the loggerhead – an endangered species – back to health, keepers enlisted the help of researchers and a local prosthetics-maker to get her swimming again.

Early versions of prosthetic flippers caused her pain or fell off quickly, and with money short, Kamezaki said he sometimes felt like packing it in.

“There have been times I wanted to give up and just fix her up the best we can and throw her back in,” he told Reuters. “Then if luck’s on her side she’ll be fine, if not, she’ll get eaten and that’s just life. The way of nature, I suppose.”

via Keepers give loggerhead turtle prosthetic fins to swim again.

4. Why would you torture a living creature like this?  To ensure that she makes babies.  To inscribe the reproductive responsibility– the survival of the species into this single tortured being.  And of course Aquarium director Kamezaki knows that if she did have babies it “would make all the trauma in her life worthwhile.”

Though Kamezaki admits that it’s unlikely Yu will ever live a normal turtle life, he still has hopes.

“My dream for her is that one day she can use her prosthetic fins to swim to the surface, walk about, and dig a proper hole to lay her eggs in,” Kamezaki said.

“When her children hatch, well, I just feel that would make all the trauma in her life worthwhile.”

via Keepers give loggerhead turtle prosthetic fins to swim again.

5.  I am in favor of doing what we can to save endangered species.  And I like turtles, quite a bit.  But I’m offended at this techno-science band-aid fantasy public relations memo masquerading as science news.  For those slow to notice, the 28th version of Yu’s prosthetic flippers fell off less than a day after being attached.   That’s right, these wretched researcher/prosthetic makers/aquarium directors didn’t actually help this turtle yet again, and they’d like the world to know that they screwed up again.

But along the way the aquarium makes money, the scientists get fame, newspapers have a quaint human interest story, and humans world wide get to imagine that all the brutality of commercial fishing is being neatly fixed by magical experts who are attaching fake-flippers back on mauled turtles.  The desire to imagine the ecological harm done by human beings can be so easily fixed is at the heart of the problem.

The distraction of a single cute critter coupled with the affirmation of human-beings all-mighty capabilities (despite not actually turning out to have been that capable) makes this a most poisonous read.   Stop making yourself less guilty by using desperate measures to save individual cute animals — make structural changes in society to stop harming animals.

Leave a comment

Filed under Animals, capitalism, communication, learning, media, propaganda, representation

Frank Ocean (and Malcolm X) read disrespectfully

Two things about my bias on the topic of Frank Ocean fighting Chris Brown:

1.  I’ve been on team Frank Ocean for a while.

2. I think Chris Brown is a douchebag.

***

Thanks to missinfo.tv for the nice graphic.

In the days following the fight between Frank Ocean and Chris Brown a lot of discussion about both of the artists were made visible in the commentary about the fight.  One of the most interesting to me is the January 28 MissInfo report on the disagreement.  Shortly after this post appeared, Frank Ocean chose not to press charges and forgave Chris Brown, but for a day in January 2013, the hip hop world thought Frank Ocean was snitching.  When the reports came out that Frank Ocean was going to press charges, MissInfo authored a funny send up of the New York Post’s coverage and added her own humorous image seen above.

It is worth taking time to talk about Missinfo’s choice of representation.  I assume that this graphic suggests that Frank Ocean took it too far — fighting for a parking space.  A tactic to minimize the significance of the violence and in particular associate the violence with the parking space rather than . . . say . . . anti-gay slurs.  MissInfo explains why she asked her friend to make the parody image of Frank Ocean as Malcolm X:

At least that hogwash about this being a “hate crime” got kiboshed. That would have been absurd. Correction…more absurd. This whole thing is already all the way Absurdistan.

In reaction to the story, I asked my buddy Phil to create a parody-homage for my instagram.

via MissInfo.tv » Frank Ocean Wants To Press Charges Against Chris Brown, Says L.A. Sheriff.

The image of Malcolm X has such an amazing history — it was taken during the under-discussed late years of El Hajj Malik El Shabazz where he was actively struggling with the Nation of Islam and building a new organization all while under heavy government surveillance.  Death threats, shootings and the 1965 firebombing of his house (almost killing his family) are necessary context for this image itself.  Separate the visual from the history or context and it becomes malleable, able to be bent to the representation at hand.

(I wonder if MissInfo thinks that the armed Malcolm X is absurd, or is this just one more heavily armed person taking it too far and fighting over a parking space?  If it is Malcolm X in this parody — reduced to someone who is a stand-in for armed extremist then we cut out a serious political history — sanitizing Shabazz.  If this is a comparison intended to mock Frank Ocean’s choice to press charges — in essence anchoring the act of violence to the parking space.  “Defend your parking space.” then the seriousness of Malcolm X is used to trivialize Frank Ocean.)

Today’s lengthy piece on Frank Ocean in the New York Times magazine gives a slightly more journalistic edge to the history between Chris Brown and Frank Ocean.

A feud with the notoriously violent and thin-skinned singer Chris Brown began on Twitter in June 2011 and included a couple of Brown’s associates following Ocean’s car after he left a studio. They posted footage of their interaction — the cars side by side, threats being hollered through open windows — to Worldstar Hip-Hop, a Web site that does many things but mostly hosts videos of fights. Ocean made an oblique mention of that situation when we were together, but I thought it was over. Then last month, the feud boiled over again, with conflicting reports that agreed on one thing: There had been an altercation between Ocean and Brown and a few other people on the street in Santa Monica.

via Frank Ocean Can Fly – NYTimes.com.

I’m pretty sure that last sentence is the best the New York Times editors feel safe releasing — without knowing more they don’t make a claim about what caused or what happened.

TMZ got a copy of the police report, and we get a slightly more direct choice of representations here.

Our Investigation revealed Victim Breaux, a music artist also known as Frank Ocean, was battered by Suspects Brown, Omololu, and Glass due to an apparent argument over a parking space.

The victim was initially uncooperative and did not want to give any details of the fight at the location of the incident, except for saying that he was assaulted.  The victim also refused any medical treatment for a cut to his right index finger and minor cut on his left temple.  The victim went to Cedars Sinai Hospital on his own and agreed to talk to us once at the hospital.  Therefore no arrests were made at the time of this report.

Once at the hospital, the victim told us Suspect Brown, also a music artist, was parked in the victim’s assigned parking spot at Westlake Recording Studios.  he walked to Suspect Brown in the lobby of the Studio and told Suspect Brown that he was parked in his parking spot.  Suddenly, Suspect Brown punched the victim on the side of his face.  Thereafter, suspects Omololu and Glass jumped in to help Suspect Brown beat the victim.  The victim fought back to defend himself as all three suspects pushed him into a corner and attempted to kick him while on the ground.  The entire fight lasted 1 to 2 minutes.  The victim believes he might have heard someone yell, “faggot!” but was unsure, who if anyone, made the statement.  After the beating, Suspect Brown said, “We can bust on you to! “Bust” is a slang term sued on the street to mean shoot.  The three suspects left the studio in an unknown direction.

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0205_chris_brown_report.pdf

There is a lot in this segment of the police report to contrast against MissInfo arguments.  Layer the police report against her choice of language to describe the fight.

Late last night, our worlds were rocked by the outbreak of violence between two sweet R&B crooners, Chris Brown, of the Greenish-Yellow Locks Vs. Frank Ocean, of The Exotic Headband. The two bumped heads (and a finger) after an argument in the parking lot of the Westlake recording studio. There were reports that Frank was upset over Chris parking in his space, and that Chris was blocked from driving off, and that Chris attempted a handshake, but then the scuffle popped off between the stars and their crews…and then doves cried.

via MissInfo.tv » Frank Ocean Wants To Press Charges Against Chris Brown, Says L.A. Sheriff.

There is a sexualized tone to her trivializing writeup in the choice of “sweet,” “bumped heads,” and “doves cried,”  to describe the fight.  And of course the notion that the fight is about the parking space instead of perhaps the long-standing disagreement that the New York Times was unable to uncover, or the refusal of the offered hand shake.  (I dunno, would you shake Chris Brown’s hand?)

Mostly MissInfo is enforcing — quite effectively — the ideology of no snitching.  She writes: “Frank Ocean doesn’t care about your silly “code of the streets”…He wants JUSTICE!”

And the funny part of this is that Frank Ocean has embodied the same code.  The police report makes this clear: “The victim was initially uncooperative and did not want to give any details of the fight at the location of the incident, except for saying that he was assaulted.”

And regardless of the cultural impact the fight and the representation present in MissInfo’s blog, Frank Ocean never did actually press charges.  Not only does he stand firmly with the wave of no snitching, but he recognized the intense negative public relations effects of being the person who testified sending Chris Brown to prison would have on his career.

Isn’t that how abusers often get away?  Relying on the fact that it sucks for any survivor of violence to have to deal with the police and courts.  It is totally unfair to suggest that it is Frank Ocean’s responsibility to press charges. I don’t know and can’t begin to judge.  But I can be sympathetic to the forces at work triggered by this sublime moment of violence.  And I suspect that most people would do the same thing — and like any other survivor of violence whose perpetrator is not in any way accountable — live with the conflicted reality of that choice.

As an anti-violence educator, I always make clear that the choice of violence is in the hands of the person being violent.  You don’t blame domestic abuse on survivors of domestic abusers.  The choice and responsibility for violence is solely — and intensely on the shoulders of those who choose violence.

It might seem like nit-picking, but I think it is fruitful to look at this one moment and the choices of this one hip hop intellectual (MissInfo) in her choices in telling the story of this fight.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under communication, Gay, hip hop, juxtaposition, media, music, police, propaganda, representation

Beyonce: drop the mic

Any questions?

Leave a comment

Filed under art, funk & soul, media, music, propaganda

Donna Haraway reads National Geographic part 2

Astounding.

Leave a comment

Filed under academics, Animals, colonialism, communication, feminism, learning, media, nature, representation

Picking a fight out of your division: Bonz Malone

Intellectual giant and cultural wizard Bonz Malone offers a vicious attack on Spike Lee in this interview on the OKAY Player Radio.  The subject is sort of about Django Unchained, but really it should be about Bonz Malone.  It made me think about Spike Lee making an enemy of Indiana Pacer Reggie Miller.

Bonz wrecks spike Lee, but of course, he doesn’t make films.  In the same way, Spike Lee doesn’t actually play competitive basketball and Reggie Miller took the taunts from the film-maker and well . . . just watch.

One possible lesson is stay in your lane.

The other is that it is healthy for us to share insights across experiences.  And you certainly don’t have to be in the NBA to have an opinion on basketball.  Bonz Malone gets at some real and interesting things in this discussion.  Worth a listen.

Leave a comment

Filed under hip hop, learning, media, race, representation, slavery

Anonymity: Richard Marx isn’t shameless, and a dinner party with Bill Ayers

Anonymity ain’t what it used to be.

Used to be you could mouth off in the cheap sheets about a mediocre musician who hasn’t had a hit in twenty years.  Not in 2013. Artists have access to the internet too and they will drive their Lexus to your local dive bar and hold you accountable!

Why would someone who sold 30 million records care what a TV station blogger says? Then on Sunday I got this email:

No explanation for why you write that I’m “shameless?” You act pretty tough sitting alone in your little room behind your laptop.

If you’d written you hated my music, that’s cool. Like I could give a shit. But saying I’m “shameless” calls into question my character and integrity.

This is my hometown…where my kids live…where my mother lives…and this will not stand with me.

Would you say that to my face? Let’s find out. I’ll meet you anywhere in the city, any time. I don’t travel again until the end of the week. Let’s hash this out like men.

Never heard of you in my life before, but between various columnist/radio friends and an array of people at NBC, I now know plenty about you. You don’t know anything about me. But you’re about to.

This isn’t going away.

Richard Marx

I called my editor.

“I’ve been getting emails from some guy who says he’s Richard Marx,” I said. “I think it’s an impostor. The only thing that makes me think it might really be Richard Marx is that it’s from an AOL account.”

My editor had been a waiter at a pizzeria in Lake Bluff, where Richard Marx ate with his family.

“He was a terrible tipper and a real douche,” my editor said. “We used to argue about who had to serve him. His wife is taller than he is.”

via Right Here Waiting – The Morning News.

And of course, what happens if Weather Underground organizers offer to cook a dinner for a local charity?  Conservative bloggers buy the seats:

There was a little “Buy Instantly” button on our dinner item that someone could select for $2,500, which seemed absurdly high. But in early December TV celebrity and conservative bad boy Tucker Carlson clicked his mouse, and we were his.

I loved it immediately. Surely he had some frat boy prank up his sleeve—a kind of smug and superior practical joke or an ad hominem put-down—but so what? We’d just raised more for the Public Square in one bid than anyone thought would be raised from the entire auction. We won!

Well, not so fast—this did mean we had to prepare dinner for Carlson plus five, and that could become messy. But, maybe it wouldn’t, and anyway, we argued, it’s just a couple of distasteful hours at most, and, then bingo! Cash the check.

via Boston Review — Bill Ayers: Breaking Bread with Breitbart.

Leave a comment

Filed under food, learning, media

Colorlines on Django – can we critique a fiction?

Colorlines have the *science* on Django Unchained and slavery.  Among their “Top ten things you should know about slavery but won’t learn at ‘Django’ are the following crucial insights:

3) Africans possessed unique expertise which Europeans required to make their colonial ventures successful. Africans knew how to grow and cultivate crops in tropical and semi-tropical climates. African rice growers, for instance, were captured in order to bring their agricultural knowledge to America’s sea islands and those of the Caribbean. Many West African civilizations possessed goldsmiths and expert metal workers on a grand scale. These slaves were snatched to work in Spanish and Portuguese gold and silver mines throughout Central and South America. Contrary to the myth of unskilled labor, large numbers of Africans were anything but.

via 10 Things You Should Know About Slavery and Won’t Learn at ‘Django’ – COLORLINES.

And this nice reminder about the violent disciplinary work of slavery economics:

6) The brutalization and psychological torture of slaves was designed to ensure that plantations stayed in the black financially.

Slave revolts and acts of sabotage were relatively common on Southern plantations. As economic enterprises, the disruption in production was bad for business. Over time a system of oppression emerged to keep things humming along. This centered on singling out slaves for public torture who had either participated in acts of defiance or who tended towards noncompliance. In fact, the most recalcitrant slaves were sent to institutions, such as the “Sugar House” in Charleston, S.C., where cruelty was used to elicit cooperation. Slavery’s most inhumane aspects were just another tool to guarantee the bottom line.

via 10 Things You Should Know About Slavery and Won’t Learn at ‘Django’ – COLORLINES.

And key to remember that many of those who made profits from slavery continue to be the global elite:

9) Many firms on Wall Street made fortunes from funding the slave trade.

Investment in slavery was one of the most profitable economic activities throughout most of New York’s 350 year history. Much of the financing for the slave economy flowed through New York banks. Marquis names such as JP Morgan Chase and New York Life all profited greatly from slavery. Lehman Brothers, one of Wall Street’s largest firms until 2008, got its start in the slave economy of Alabama. Slavery was so important to the city that New York was one the most pro-slavery urban municipalities in the North.

via 10 Things You Should Know About Slavery and Won’t Learn at ‘Django’ – COLORLINES.

I like this list and would only add an eleventh argument – fleshing out some discussion of gender.  I agree with Angela Davis that a lot of the violent responses by white folks during reconstruction was mobilized around the representation of the threat of black men raping white women.  I think we can track some of current American tensions about sexuality to this decade of image/cultural construction: white male supremacy, female purity and implications of criminality associated with black skin.  Despite being incorrect and made up, these ideas stuck around.

In the comments section of the Colorlines article, one person asks:

‘Django Unchained’ was FICTION why does everyone want to hold it up to fact-checking? These 10 points are correct but had nothing to do with the film. I know so many people that have been discouraged from seeing a great film because the net is flooded with articles about how historically inaccurate the film is. It’s a cowboy styled revenge film where the hero is a black man…

via 10 Things You Should Know About Slavery and Won’t Learn at ‘Django’ – COLORLINES.

I wouldn’t speak for the Colorlines author, Imara Jones, but in my opinion the importance of Django is precisely that it is a popular fictional representation about slavery.  I don’t think it’s real, but Django, along with a long-line of films (Gone with the wind) about slavery can be probed for shared themes, threads, preferred representations.  The fictional liberties are worth examining not for historical accuracy, but for current political implications.

Leave a comment

Filed under art, feminism, media, race, representation, slavery

Pepsi panic: Beyonce and Mark Bittman

I’m bored with the moral panic associated with Beyonce’s decision to take a big pile of money from Pepsi.  I’m not sure it is fair to expect political leadership or moral consistency from Beyonce.  She is a staggeringly talented entertainer — and anyone who makes personal decisions based on what Beyonce does has their own problems.

Mark Bittman has a pretty hard-worded critique of Beyonce’s Pepsi contract, mostly from the perspective of health in today’s New York Times.

I think we should criticize Pepsi, not the celebrities that they rent to hock their brand.  In some ways Beyonce is an easy target.  Attacking her might even distract from the substantial conversations we need to have about the health harms of soda.  We could note the historical antecedents of disrespecting and diminishing the power of black women entertainers.

And I can’t help but feel a little sorry for Beyonce, because, as a child of the eighties, the Pepsi sponsorship was a sign that a star had become a mega-star.  It is a sign of the shifting culture that we are now moving soda manufacturers into the category with cigarette companies, and her sponsorship is now *bad press*.

I like Mark Bittman, and he is welcome for dinner at my house any time.  I appreciate that he uses his platform in the New York Times to talk about important cultural and health dynamics of food.  In this essay he reminds us of the pervasive ability of sugary beverage manufacturers to advertise to us.  Product placement for instance:

My friend Laurie David counted 26 on-air shots of Coke during last season’s “American Idol” finale and an incredible 324 shots of Snapple in a June episode of “America’s Got Talent.” (“There are Snapple cups placed in front of each judge,” she wrote me. “I counted every time I saw a Snapple cup.”)

To those jaded enough to ask “So what?” I’d reply that’s a measure of how successful these kinds of campaigns are.

via Why Do Stars Think It’s O.K. To Sell Soda? – NYTimes.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under capitalism, food, health, media, race, representation

Caine’s Arcade going global!

A few months ago I posted the kick-ass video of nine year old Caine, who made a cardboard arcade.
Here is the update.

 

It looks pretty sick!

Leave a comment

Filed under art, documentary, learning, media