Category Archives: representation

Lil B: beat the odds

If you like rap music a little bit, then you are asked to pick favorites.  Part of that is rivalries, where if you are a fan of one group or artist, you stay away from or even deter other people from listening to your favorite musician’s competition.

A more pernicious kind of intellectual trap comes when you feel a rapper wrongs you.  They might release a song or collaboration with someone who you know sucks.  Or they write a verse praising domestic violence or some crap like that.

Lil’ B has crossed his audience’s expectations so many times that they now expect the bizarre (if they’re still around).  You might pick up one of his ‘rap’ albums or mixtapes and discover very little that sounds like rapping.  Stream-of-consciousness un-clever wordplay.  Exceptionally awkward delivery, ideas that trail off.  Songs that make no sense to someone who is trying to listen to it with charitable ears.  It’s not edited to showcase Lil B’s clarity, his music is edited to showcase the mistakes. I’d argue that his performances expose Lil’ B’s vulnerabilities and screw-ups as an invitation to consider similarities.

Part of that is the idea of based — to return the living performative and free-wheeling lyricism.

There is a lot more interesting to talk about the based god.  Consider the political/rhetorical shenanigans of Lil’ B.  Calling his album “I’m gay.” His deeply internet-entwined performance and fanbase.  His discussion with his fans/friends makes an interesting impact on language.  He moves forward with toxic language choices for example ‘based god fucked my bitch.’

There is no positive element to that phrase.  The “my” suggests ownership over a woman.  Objectification and comparison to animals in the word bitch.  The weary trope of a celebrity having sex with someone’s girlfriend or partner.  Disempowerment and pain are really conveyed in this short phrase.

But somehow Lil B uses it to suggest solidarity.  He seems honestly shocked when asked in interviews if he would have sex with someone’s wife or mom — saying he never has.  He simply uses the words to convey something quite differently.

In some ways it sorts out his audience for him.  If you are hip enough to get past the terrible linguistic jump then you can be in the club.  Shouting painfully sexist and disempowering phrase is part of the invitation to something else with Lil B.

In the case of Lil B I just take each release on it’s own.  No reason to love or hate the artist forever.  Sometimes he’ll make a nice tune.  I know, pretty un-hip hop.  Let alone un-feminist.  In this case, we get “beat the odds,” a seemingly sincere, almost saccharine ode to hustling.

Mark my words: from Lil B riding in a sports car with Souljah Boy to riding the bus in this video.  We are going to see the return of working class images and references in hip hop.

Leave a comment

Filed under communication, feminism, hip hop, representation

Doorknockers on unpacking white privilege

If you aren’t reading the brilliant and insightful blog doorknockers — go catch up.  I was struck this morning by Kristia’s essay inviting a deeper understanding of  the go-to-tool-for-reflection Peggy McIntosh’s essay “Unpacking the backpack of white privilege.”  This article has been THE explanation of injustice to people with power for like 20 years.  And it doesn’t really get at the full power of language and inequality.

I’ve always felt like McIntosh points to a kind of Annunciation frame of justice.  If a person with power can announce that they know how they are privileged then they’re off the hook. Thanks to Doorknockers for some broadening of this discussion.

It should be clear by now that this is not at all intended as a bashing of Peggy McIntosh, but it is very much a critique of academics and schools that maintain at best a lightweight analysis of power. They do this primarily by letting one article by one White woman dominate conversations about privilege, as opposed to hosting a larger, deeper analysis of systems of power in our society. They do this by keeping the numbers of brown-skinned faculty and students low. They do this by rewarding brown-skinned students who agree to shut up in racist, heterosexist classes. They do this by not teaching about privilege, power, and oppression through the very writing, oratory, panel interviews, and reflection of parents and children who work minimum-wage, who are of color, who are political and religious minorities.

via Doorknockers: Unpacking the Invisible Purse: A response to years of Peggy McIntosh-based analysis.

Leave a comment

Filed under colonialism, communication, feminism, media, race, representation

Arundhati Roy on Indian Maoists

I like this article (and the original article) because of Roy’s awareness of how talking about ideas changes them.  This is at the core of the modern power of change — language and ideas.  Important stuff here.

“The country that I live in is becoming more and more repressive, more and more of a police state…. India is hardening as a state. It has to continue to give the impression of being a messy, cuddly democracy but actually what’s going on outside the arc lights is really desperate.”

But at the same time it remains an open society, and the arguments are there to be won. In 2009 the government announced Operation Greenhunt, a new, even tougher attempt to kill off the Maoist insurgency, but it sparked fierce resistance, both inside the forest and beyond. “Among the Indian elite it was okay just to call them Maoist terrorists: they had been de-humanised. So when I, who am not a Maoist, went in and wrote about who they were, it made them human beings, fighting for something very, very serious. And that makes a big difference.

“This is a very interesting time where I think the debates are being cracked open. Real intervention at a real moment can change the paradigm of the debate, even if it doesn’t instantly cause a revolution.”

via Arundhati Roy: ‘The next novel will just have to wait…’ – Features, Books – The Independent.

Leave a comment

Filed under capitalism, colonialism, human rights, protest, representation

Bob Gruen: rock photographer and chill dude

“People ask me how do I get to be friends with musicians,” Mr. Gruen said. “How do you get to be friends with anybody?” He thinks about it for a moment. “Joe Franklin used to say, ‘It’s nice to be important, but it’s more important to be nice.’ ”

via Bob Gruen Captures the World of Rock in Photos – NYTimes.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under communication, representation

Hacking and the paranoia of the nation

The assumed brightline between information warfare and warfare has become blurry.

Here is the LA Times reporting that the British have used government spy hackers to attack an Al Qaeda newspaper, replacing the bomb making instructions with the winning cupcake recipe from an Ellen episode.   Huh?

In its summer edition last year, Inspire featured an article titled “Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom.” But British spy agents belonging to GCHQ infiltrated the pages and “corrupted” them, erasing the instructions and leaving the cupcake recipe in its place.

The Daily Telegraph in London also ran a story that said “the code, which had been inserted into the original magazine by the British intelligence hackers, was actually a web page of recipes for ‘The Best Cupcakes in America’ published by the Ellen DeGeneres chat show.”

via British spy agents reportedly hack Al Qaeda magazine, replacing its bomb-making instructions with recipes for cupcakes – latimes.com.

The Guardian reports on the well-established Chinese military hacking unit “known as the cyber blue team.”  China announced that it had established the group to influence culture.

Rather than hacking attacks aimed at obtaining private or secret information, Ye and Zhao said China was threatened by psychological operations that used the internet to shift public opinion against governments. They cited the “domino effect” seen in the Middle East and north Africa created by Facebook, Twitter and other social media that are banned by China’s great firewall of censorship.

via China brands Google ‘snotty-nosed’ as cyber feud intensifies | World news | The Guardian.

A couple of days ago, the United States announced it’s new International strategy for cyberspace.  The big change?  The United States wanted to make clear that we can respond with military force when hacked.  That’s right, the next North African kid who messes with the US firewall might face some Cruise missiles.

Leave a comment

Filed under communication, hacking, propaganda, protest, representation, Surveillance, technology