Category Archives: communication

Juxtaposition: camping

Artifact one: Camping before the Twilight premier

Photo by Mario Anzuoni/Reuters/Landov

Artifact 2: Camping at #occupy oakland

Thanks to #occupy contra costa for the photo

Leave a comment

Filed under capitalism, communication, juxtaposition, protest, representation

Violence against animals to frame killing humans

I think Carol J. Adams is one of the most important thinkers of this century.

Her work as a feminist vegetarian ethicist has helped me better understand how violence against animals is a fruitful comparison available for those who hurt humans.

Consider the US soldiers who killed Afghani civilians and then took parts of their bodies as souvenirs.

In his testimony, Gibbs denied responsibility for the killings, but did admit to slicing off body parts from Afghans, including the fingers of a man, and keeping them or giving them to other soldiers as trophies.

“In my mind, I was there to take the antlers off the deer. You have to come to terms with what you’re doing. Shooting people is not an easy thing to do,” said Gibbs.

via US ‘kill team’ trial: jury considers Calvin Gibbs verdict | World news | guardian.co.uk.

Leave a comment

Filed under Animals, communication, feminism, human rights, representation

Looking at objectification of women from the side

The process of objectification — to take a living, complex 3-dimensional person and render them into two-dimensions –  is a significant part of modern communication.  Advertising and television helping to constitute our very desires.  Reflecting on previous invitations of objectification can help us to understand how we are being organized.

Fray magazine has twenty images of playboy playmate lips juxtaposed with the causes of their deaths. The artist is Jennifer Daniel.

There are some obvious problems with this project.  Using previously objectified people runs the risk that the reader will simply re-create the old pattern of knowledge.  But something about this obscuring of the sexy bodies and the bringing forward of the deaths gets at the realness of humans who have been pushed aside for their body images.

For instance Miss November 1969 who’s turnoffs include: “people who are always late,” dies in an auto accident.  Was she rushing to an appointment?  Was she killed by someone drunk driving?  Was she driving?

I find the piece sad and lonely.  Perhaps in that way it can be a restorative to help respond to the relentless pressures of bodily discipline.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under capitalism, communication, feminism, health, juxtaposition, representation

Chris Hedges and Cornel West prosecute Goldman Sachs

Thanks to Glen E. Friedman, we have a little write up and video from Chris Hedges and Cornel West prosecuting a corporation in the #occupy wallstreet park.

This is the kind of street theater we need to see in cities all across America. In addition to marching and occupying public places, we need to explore creative and provocative ways to capture the attention of the media. In our ADD culture, we’ve got to keep things interesting. West and Hedges are taking a page from the Abbie Hoffman play book.

via WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU DONE?: THE PEOPLE VS.GOLDMAN SACHS: CORNEL WEST AND CHRIS HEDGES PRESIDING.

Leave a comment

Filed under capitalism, communication, documentary, juxtaposition, media, protest, resistance

Worried about 7 Billion people? Get over yourself.

Ah yes, the overly-simplistic logic of overpopulation fanatics.  Seven billion people . . . ooooh, what a scary Halloween.

Lets take dumb-ass of the month (only one day left . . . who will win in November?) Dr. Eric Tayag:

Dr. Eric Tayag of the Philippines’ Department of Health said in the AFP report: “Seven billion is a number we should think about deeply. We should really focus on the question of whether there will be food, clean water, shelter, education and a decent life for every child. If the answer is no, it would be better for people to look at easing this population explosion.”

via 7 billionth baby: Congratulations are mixed with dire words – latimes.com.

1.  If you  use the term “explosion” or “population bomb” to describe actual humans, you should immediate be sent back to health class.  Dehumanization by comparison to an inanimate killer is 180 degrees opposite from making a baby.  It is the easiest cue that you are reading or listening to an idiot if they use this language.

2.  Human beings make babies, some of them make many babies because they might want several babies.  Some parents may have kids because they want to love them.  If you don’t like that you shouldn’t have babies.

3.  If you are terrified about the new babies of the world using up your resources, get over yourself.  The lack of ” food, clean water, shelter, education and a decent life for every child” is about poverty and justice.  Work to make sure that every person in the world get’s access to these things.  It’s about politics not about penises.  To imagine that the solution is to reduce population or as Dr. Tayag says “easing” population is part of the racist day-dream that too often leads to sterilization abuses and eugenics.

4.  If you are really concerned with the ecology and sustainability of the earth then STOP USING SO MANY RESOURCES.  No I don’t mean babies, but you — the person wiping their ass with clean paper and pissing in clean drinking water.

Leave a comment

Filed under capitalism, colonialism, communication, human rights

Lil B: beat the odds

If you like rap music a little bit, then you are asked to pick favorites.  Part of that is rivalries, where if you are a fan of one group or artist, you stay away from or even deter other people from listening to your favorite musician’s competition.

A more pernicious kind of intellectual trap comes when you feel a rapper wrongs you.  They might release a song or collaboration with someone who you know sucks.  Or they write a verse praising domestic violence or some crap like that.

Lil’ B has crossed his audience’s expectations so many times that they now expect the bizarre (if they’re still around).  You might pick up one of his ‘rap’ albums or mixtapes and discover very little that sounds like rapping.  Stream-of-consciousness un-clever wordplay.  Exceptionally awkward delivery, ideas that trail off.  Songs that make no sense to someone who is trying to listen to it with charitable ears.  It’s not edited to showcase Lil B’s clarity, his music is edited to showcase the mistakes. I’d argue that his performances expose Lil’ B’s vulnerabilities and screw-ups as an invitation to consider similarities.

Part of that is the idea of based — to return the living performative and free-wheeling lyricism.

There is a lot more interesting to talk about the based god.  Consider the political/rhetorical shenanigans of Lil’ B.  Calling his album “I’m gay.” His deeply internet-entwined performance and fanbase.  His discussion with his fans/friends makes an interesting impact on language.  He moves forward with toxic language choices for example ‘based god fucked my bitch.’

There is no positive element to that phrase.  The “my” suggests ownership over a woman.  Objectification and comparison to animals in the word bitch.  The weary trope of a celebrity having sex with someone’s girlfriend or partner.  Disempowerment and pain are really conveyed in this short phrase.

But somehow Lil B uses it to suggest solidarity.  He seems honestly shocked when asked in interviews if he would have sex with someone’s wife or mom — saying he never has.  He simply uses the words to convey something quite differently.

In some ways it sorts out his audience for him.  If you are hip enough to get past the terrible linguistic jump then you can be in the club.  Shouting painfully sexist and disempowering phrase is part of the invitation to something else with Lil B.

In the case of Lil B I just take each release on it’s own.  No reason to love or hate the artist forever.  Sometimes he’ll make a nice tune.  I know, pretty un-hip hop.  Let alone un-feminist.  In this case, we get “beat the odds,” a seemingly sincere, almost saccharine ode to hustling.

Mark my words: from Lil B riding in a sports car with Souljah Boy to riding the bus in this video.  We are going to see the return of working class images and references in hip hop.

Leave a comment

Filed under communication, feminism, hip hop, representation

Iran lectures the United States on human rights

Zing.  There it is.  Iranian Member of Parliament Zohre Elahian suggests that the United States be criticized for human rights violations stemming from police repression of protesters.

Elahian, who is the chairperson of the Majlis Human Rights Committee, also said that the UN Human Rights Council should address the issue of the violation of U.S. protesters’ rights.

“The scenes of the suppression of US protesters are upsetting and necessitate pursuing human rights (violations),” she said.

She went on to say that the era of U.S. claims about human rights has come to an end and the U.S. government has lost face due to the suppression of the people.

In addition, she called on the international community to condemn the use of excessive violence by the U.S. police against protesters.

via Occupy Oakland – police under scrutiny live updates | World news | guardian.co.uk.

[Although I got it from the Guardian, the original report is from the Associated Press. ]

Leave a comment

Filed under colonialism, communication, human rights, juxtaposition, protest

Welcome to Oakland #occupy wallstreet

Photo ran in the Guardian, taken by Kimihiro Hoshino/AFP/Getty Images

 

Photo credit Daryl Bush, AP, ran in the Guardian

 

photo byStephen Lam, Reuters, ran in the Guardian

 

This collection of images is pretty disturbing.  No good photos of the police/protester scraps from yesterday in US media, but the British journal has the images.  I found the same thing when I went to look for images of the crackdown on Chicago #operation wallstreet.  Lets note protesters helping each other and excessive police violence intended to communicate threats to the supportive public.  Lets also note courage, generosity and the elements of a new world being articulated.  The kind of world which disturbs corporate heads and their cop subordinates.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under capitalism, communication, human rights, propaganda, protest

Propaganda of big soda

Thanks to consumerist.com for the alterered billboard image.

I gave up soda-type beverages a couple of years ago.  I certainly enjoyed the carbonated, caffeinated little cans of wonder, but somehow I knew that they weren’t good for me.  As a scholar of propaganda, I’m amazed at how similar the large soda manufacturing companies are to the large tobacco manufacturing companies.

The comparison is mostly that they seek to change audiences minds without letting them know that they have a vested interested in selling more soda. I’m not the only one who noticed this comparison.  Kelly Brownell writes the following in Time Magazine:

The soda industry funds scientists who reliably produce research showing no link between SSB consumption and health. The tobacco industry bought favor from community and national organizations by giving large donations. In an ironic twist, Coca Cola and PepsiCo are corporate sponsors of the American Dietetic Association.

The soda industry hit a new low this year. In 2010, Philadelphia’s mayor and health commissioner had both supported an SSB tax and came within one vote of having the tax passed by the city council. In 2011, when the mayor made it clear he would reintroduce the tax, the industry created an organization called Foundation for a Healthy America, which gave a gift of $10 million to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia for research and prevention of childhood obesity. Would the hospital accept money from a tobacco company to study anti-smoking programs? The hospital tried to give some of the money to the city to run obesity programs through city health centers, but the mayor refused on the grounds it was funded by the beverage industry.

via Kelly Brownell on the Dirty Tactics of Soda Companies | TIME Ideas | TIME.com.

1 Comment

Filed under capitalism, communication, media, propaganda

Doorknockers on unpacking white privilege

If you aren’t reading the brilliant and insightful blog doorknockers — go catch up.  I was struck this morning by Kristia’s essay inviting a deeper understanding of  the go-to-tool-for-reflection Peggy McIntosh’s essay “Unpacking the backpack of white privilege.”  This article has been THE explanation of injustice to people with power for like 20 years.  And it doesn’t really get at the full power of language and inequality.

I’ve always felt like McIntosh points to a kind of Annunciation frame of justice.  If a person with power can announce that they know how they are privileged then they’re off the hook. Thanks to Doorknockers for some broadening of this discussion.

It should be clear by now that this is not at all intended as a bashing of Peggy McIntosh, but it is very much a critique of academics and schools that maintain at best a lightweight analysis of power. They do this primarily by letting one article by one White woman dominate conversations about privilege, as opposed to hosting a larger, deeper analysis of systems of power in our society. They do this by keeping the numbers of brown-skinned faculty and students low. They do this by rewarding brown-skinned students who agree to shut up in racist, heterosexist classes. They do this by not teaching about privilege, power, and oppression through the very writing, oratory, panel interviews, and reflection of parents and children who work minimum-wage, who are of color, who are political and religious minorities.

via Doorknockers: Unpacking the Invisible Purse: A response to years of Peggy McIntosh-based analysis.

Leave a comment

Filed under colonialism, communication, feminism, media, race, representation